This instruction, published today (feast of Our Lady of Fatima) by the Pontifical Commission
Ecclesia Dei and dated on the memorial of Pope Saint Pius V (the Pope of the implementation of the Council of Trent), will already have been commented on elsewhere and I haven’t yet read those comments. Here is what I am picking up as I read through it.
The full text of the Instruction can be
found here.
1. The Apostolic Letter Summorum Pontificum of the Sovereign Pontiff Benedict XVI given Motu Proprio on 7 July 2007, which came into effect on 14 September 2007, has made the richness of the Roman Liturgy more accessible to the Universal Church.
The re-introduction of the usus antiquior is therefore good for the WHOLE Church. There is a richness in the Roman Liturgy which is not accessible in the Mass of Paul VI alone.
3. The Holy Father, having recalled the concern of the Sovereign Pontiffs in caring for the Sacred Liturgy and in their recognition of liturgical books, reaffirms the traditional principle, recognised from time immemorial and necessary to be maintained into the future, that "each particular Church must be in accord with the universal Church not only regarding the doctrine of the faith and sacramental signs, but also as to the usages universally handed down by apostolic and unbroken tradition. These are to be maintained not only so that errors may be avoided, but also so that the faith may be passed on in its integrity, since the Church's rule of prayer (lex orandi) corresponds to her rule of belief (lex credendi)."
Liturgy is a vessel for the handing on of the faith from one generation to the next. We mess with it at our peril. According to St Vincent of Lerins (+445) the test of revealed and apostolic doctrine is
“quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus” (that which has been held always, everywhere and by all).
6. The Roman Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI and the last edition prepared under Pope John XXIII, are two forms of the Roman Liturgy, defined respectively as ordinaria and extraordinaria: they are two usages of the one Roman Rite, one alongside the other. Both are the expression of the same lex orandi of the Church. On account of its venerable and ancient use, the forma extraordinaria is to be maintained with appropriate honor.
The two forms of the Roman Rite are intimately connected with one another. Perhaps as beasts of burden yoked together both must pull in the same direction: towards God. But the more ancient use must be held in honour. No Catholic should therefore despise the older form. As the Instruction reminds us (n.7):
Among the statements of the Holy Father was the following: "There is no contradiction between the two editions of the Roman Missal. In the history of the Liturgy growth and progress are found, but not a rupture. What was sacred for prior generations, remains sacred and great for us as well, and cannot be suddenly prohibited altogether or even judged harmful."
And a reminder of the reasons Pope Benedict had for promulgating
Summorum Pontificum (n.8):
a.) offering to all the faithful the Roman Liturgy in the Usus Antiquior, considered as a precious treasure to be preserved;
b.) effectively guaranteeing and ensuring the use of the forma extraordinaria for all who ask for it, given that the use of the 1962 Roman Liturgy is a faculty generously granted for the good of the faithful and therefore is to be interpreted in a sense favourable to the faithful who are its principal addressees;
c.) promoting reconciliation at the heart of the Church.
The Instruction contains “Specific Norms”. The first of these (n.13) reminds the Bishops of their responsibility to implement
Summorum Pontificum in accordance with the
mens legislatoris (the “mind” of the Holy Father) as clearly expressed in the
Motu Proprio. In other words, in the case of any doubt, a Bishop must ask himself: what does the Holy Father desire?
Bishops must also promote
respect for the Extraordinary Form.
14. It is the task of the Diocesan Bishop to undertake all necessary measures to ensure respect for the forma extraordinaria of the Roman Rite, according to the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum.
He could consider:
- celebrating it himself
- arranging for it to be celebrated in his cathedral
- if he is unable or unwilling to celebrate it himself, he could demonstrate the honour and respect due to the older usage by his gracious presence at its celebration.
Much hot air has been expended on the definition of the so-called “stable group” (
coetus fidelium – “gathering of the faithful” as
Universae Ecclesiae translates it). What constitutes such a gathering of the faithful? Does it have to have been a group who had been requesting the older usage before
Summorum Pontificum? Do they have to belong to the same parish? Can they be a group of people from a wider area who have come together to request the older usage? N. 15 clears this up:
15. A coetus fidelium ("group of the faithful") can be said to be stabiliter existens ("existing in a stable manner"), according to the sense of art. 5 § 1 of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, when it is constituted by some people of an individual parish who, even after the publication of the Motu Proprio, come together by reason of their veneration for the Liturgy in the Usus Antiquior, and who ask that it might be celebrated in the parish church or in an oratory or chapel; such a coetus ("group") can also be composed of persons coming from different parishes or dioceses, who gather together in a specific parish church or in an oratory or chapel for this purpose.
Nos. 16-18 make it clear that priests and faithful who arrive at a church or oratory requesting the possibility of celebrating Mass in the extraordinary form should be received in a spirit of pastoral zeal and of generous welcome by the pastor or rector of the church who must always permit the requested celebration with due respect to the already established schedule of liturgical celebrations.
16. In the case of a priest who presents himself occasionally in a parish church or an oratory with some faithful, and wishes to celebrate in the forma extraordinaria, as foreseen by articles 2 and 4 of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, the pastor or rector of the church, or the priest responsible, is to permit such a celebration, while respecting the schedule of liturgical celebrations in that same church.
17. § 1. In deciding individual cases, the pastor or the rector, or the priest responsible for a church, is to be guided by his own prudence, motivated by pastoral zeal and a spirit of generous welcome.
§ 2. In cases of groups which are quite small, they may approach the Ordinary of the place to identify a church in which these faithful may be able to come together for such celebrations, in order to ensure easier participation and a more worthy celebration of the Holy Mass.
18. Even in sanctuaries and places of pilgrimage the possibility to celebrate in the forma extraordinaria is to be offered to groups of pilgrims who request it (cf. Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, art. 5 § 3), if there is a qualified priest.
And who is “a qualified priest”?
20 a.) Every Catholic priest who is not impeded by Canon Law is to be considered idoneus ("qualified") for the celebration of the Holy Mass in the forma extraordinaria.
Hurrah! At last it has been said!
Must he be fluent in Latin?
b.) Regarding the use of the Latin language, a basic knowledge is necessary, allowing the priest to pronounce the words correctly and understand their meaning.
No! The ability to pronounce and understand is all that is necessary. The prayers and readings of the older usage have a style that one quickly gets used to. I find that if I carefully read over the texts in Latin and English before the Mass, I am then able to understand what I am praying during the Mass. And surely a priest should do this anyway: to prayerfully meditate on the texts of the Mass before celebrating it is bound to increase his own reverence and attention, and possibly make up for any lack of attention or distraction that may befall him during the Mass.
Training in the celebration of the extraordinary form:
21. Ordinaries are asked to offer their clergy the possibility of acquiring adequate preparation for celebrations in the forma extraordinaria. This applies also to Seminaries, where future priests should be given proper formation, including study of Latin and, where pastoral needs suggest it, the opportunity to learn the forma extraordinaria of the Roman Rite.
Archbishop Nichols of Westminster is reported by the
Catholic Herald as saying:
“Personally I don’t think it needs to be added to an already crowded seminary programme because it’s a skill that can be learned later in a priest’s life.”
Dumbing
Universae Ecclesiae down a bit? The Catholic Herald has opened a debate:
Should England's seminaries teach the Extraordinary Form?
No qualified priest in the diocese?
22. In Dioceses without qualified priests, Diocesan Bishops can request assistance from priests of the Institutes erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, either to the celebrate the forma extraordinaria or to teach others how to celebrate it.
Institutes such as the
Priestly Fraternity St Peter (FSSP) or the
Instutite of Christ the King Sovereign Priest can be called upon to celebrate the Mass or to assist in training priests of the diocese to do so.
Although the Liturgical Books of the extraordinary form are to be followed without modification, new saints and prefaces are going to be included:
25. New saints and certain of the new prefaces can and ought to be inserted into the 1962 Missal, according to provisions which will be indicated subsequently.
We must await these provisions. This was already indicated in
Summorum Pontificum. and in the letter of Pope Benedict to the Bishops of the world concerning the re-introduction of the older usage.
The Scripture readings may be proclaimed in the vernacular in the following way:
- at Low Mass: either solely in Latin, solely in the vernacular, or in Latin followed by the vernacular;
- at “higher” forms of celebration: either solely in Latin, or in Latin followed by the vernacular. It would not be illicit to proclaim the readings solely in the vernacular at the more solemn celebrations.
26. As foreseen by article 6 of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, the readings of the Holy Mass of the Missal of 1962 can be proclaimed either solely in the Latin language, or in Latin followed by the vernacular or, in Low Masses, solely in the vernacular.
Which Liturgical laws apply? The Code of Canon Law 1983 is to be observed. But all liturgical law promulgated since 1962 which is incompatible with the rubrics of the liturgical books in effect in 1962 is derogated:
27. With regard to the disciplinary norms connected to celebration, the ecclesiastical discipline contained in the Code of Canon Law of 1983 applies.
28. Furthermore, by virtue of its character of special law, within its own area, the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum derogates from those provisions of law, connected with the sacred Rites, promulgated from 1962 onwards and incompatible with the rubrics of the liturgical books in effect in 1962.
So the Eucharistic fast is one hour; one may receive Holy Communion a second time in the same day; one fulfils the Sunday obligation by attending Mass in the evening of the Vigil, etc. etc. But Holy Communion is not to be given under both kinds; Holy Communion is to be received on the tongue; girls are not permitted to serve Mass.
Confirmation
29. Permission to use the older formula for the rite of Confirmation was confirmed by the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum (cf. art. 9 § 2). Therefore, in the forma extraordinaria, it is not necessary to use the newer formula of Pope Paul VI as found in the Ordo Confirmationis.
The faculty to confirm is very easily given to priests these days. I wonder if this is the intention in this Instruction or should Confirmation still be reserved to the bishop except for the most extreme cases? I remember an occasion in my previous parish when a couple of older people would have liked to have been confirmed in the extraordinary form. I had duly received faculties but, burdened by scruple, I took the opportunity to consult an official of
Ecclesia Dei who informed me that this was not the mind of the Church and that the people concerned should be asked to accept Confirmation in the ordinary form, which they graciously did.
Holy Orders
The use of the extraordinary form is restricted:
31. Only in Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life which are under the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, and in those which use the liturgical books of the forma extraordinaria, is the use of the Pontificale Romanum of 1962 for the conferral of minor and major orders permitted.
So no seminarian not belonging to one of these communities may request ordination in the extraordinary form.
These are some of the things I have considered worth noting.
Father Z comments
here, and is keeping an uptodate list of other comments
here.
CNS
reports here.
New Liturgical Movement
here.
National Catholic Register.
